Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1161519990030030247
Animal Cells and Systems
1999 Volume.3 No. 3 p.247 ~ p.252
Effectiveness and ecological implications of anuran defenses against snake predators
Choi In-Ho

Lee Sung-Ho
Ricklefs Robert E.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize antipredator tactics of anurans and to evaluate the effectiveness of these tactics for predator avoidance in real confrontations. Two types of experiments were conducted. In one experiment, one predator and one prey were placed together for one hour in a small confined space (one?to?one interaction). In another experiment, one predator and several prey were placed together for one day in a large enclosure in a field (field?based interaction). The prey consisted of three anuran species, Rana nigromaculata, R. rugosa, and Bombina orientalis; a snake species, Rhabdophis tigrinus tigrinus, was used as a predator. Results of both experiments demonstrated a range in antipredator responses of the frogs, from toxicity and warning coloration, coupled with slow responses in Bombina to little (or only slight) toxicity, crypsis, and fast take?off responses to the predator in the ranids. Both ranid species exhibited lower survival (57%) than Bombina (95%) in the field?based interaction, suggesting that motor responses of the palatable prey due to attacks of the predator ultimately limited their survival. The jumping of the ranids increased the activity of the predator, which became more likely to strike. Simple crouching (seen in R. rugosa and B. orientalis) and chemical defense (in Bombina) reduced predatory attacks.
KEYWORD
Defense, Frog, Predation, Snake
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
SCI(E) ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)